Writing in NYtimes:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/26/opinion/dune-movie-foundation-series.html?searchResultPosition=2
“Foundation” might seem unfilmable. It mostly involves people talking, and its narrative inverts the hero-saves-the-universe theme that burns many acres of CGI every year. The story spans centuries; in each episode everything appears to be on the brink, and it seems as if only desperate efforts by the protagonists can save the day. But after each crisis, Seldon’s prerecorded hologram appears to explain to everyone what just happened and why the successful resolution was inevitable given the laws of history.
So how does the Apple TV+ series turn this into a visually compelling tale? It doesn’t. What it does instead is remake “Star Wars” under another name. There are indispensable heroes, mystical powers, even a Death Star. These aren’t necessarily bad things to include in a TV series, but they’re completely antithetical to the spirit of Asimov’s writing. Pretending that this series has anything to do with the “Foundation” novels is fraudulent marketing, and I’ve stopped watching.
I've always had this kind of discussion on reddit. I was creating posts, but I wasn't getting much feedback, so I decided to just buy reddit upvotes to make myself more popular and promote my business as much as possible using this site. I think you should think about it a little at a time, as it's a great tool for good marketing policy.